📰 6 sources covering this story

Trump calls leaders to isolate Iran. And, SCOTUS backs Trump for now on mail-in voting

First covered 14 hrs ago · latest take 1 hrs ago. Compare how each outlet is covering it — and rate the sources you trust.

Trump calls leaders to isolate Iran. And, SCOTUS backs Trump for now on mail-in voting
NPR World
NPR World1 hrs ago
Trump calls leaders to isolate Iran. And, SCOTUS backs Trump for now on mail-in voting
President Trump is calling on world leaders to join his economic war against Iran. And, the Supreme Court is backing the president for now on his order to restrict mail-in voting.
SCOTUS sides with Trump administration on mail voting restrictions ahead of midterms
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court opened a path Monday for possible implementation of President Donald Trump's executive order restricting mail-in voting, though it remains unclear how much can be put in place before the fast-approaching midterm elections. The decision leaves room for additional court challenges tha
The Bulwark
The Bulwark10 hrs ago
BREAKING: SCOTUS Lets Trump Move Ahead With Mail Voting Crackdown (w/ Richard Hasen & Steve Vladek)
Sam Stein is joined by UCLA School of Law's Richard Hasen and Georgetown University Law Center's Steve Vladek to break down the Supreme Court's decision to allow Trump to restrict mail-in voting.Leave a commentJoin Bulwark+ to unlock the restBecome a paying member of The Bulwark to get access to this post and other sub
Mother Jones
Mother Jones13 hrs ago
SCOTUS Hands Trump a Temporary Win In His Crusade to Restrict Mail Voting
The Supreme Court on Monday temporarily handed President Trump a key victory in his crusade to restrict mail-in voting. The unsigned opinion by the court’s conservative majority, issued over dissents from the three Democratic appointees, said it was too soon for states to challenge Trump’s executive order from March 20
The Federalist
The Federalist🏁 first to report14 hrs ago
SCOTUS Overturns Injunction On Trump’s Mail-In Voting Order
'The Order itself does not harm the States, so the District Court lacked jurisdiction to bar the Government from trying to implement it.'