Election officials warn of potential chaos after SCOTUS brings Trump’s mail-voting order back to life

In its Monday ruling, the high court refrained from declaring Trump’s order lawful

Sam Stein is joined by UCLA School of Law's Richard Hasen and Georgetown University Law Center's Steve Vladek to break down the Supreme Court's decision to allow Trump to restrict mail-in voting.Leave a commentJoin Bulwark+ to unlock the restBecome a paying member of The Bulwark to get access to this post and other sub

The Supreme Court on Monday temporarily handed President Trump a key victory in his crusade to restrict mail-in voting. The unsigned opinion by the court’s conservative majority, issued over dissents from the three Democratic appointees, said it was too soon for states to challenge Trump’s executive order from March 20

'The Order itself does not harm the States, so the District Court lacked jurisdiction to bar the Government from trying to implement it.'

The United States Postal Service issued a 95-page final rule on Friday outlining how it would comply with President Donald Trump’s March executive order aimed at “Ensuring Citizenship Verification and Integrity in Federal Elections.” The report, which will be released on Wednesday, says USPS will direct states to provi

The agency’s order says it will deliver mail ballots only in states that share voter data with the Trump administration. The Supreme Court could rule on the matter at any point.