Business Insider
US · 3 hrs ago
✦ 75◉ Centre
The defense in Andrew Left's fraud trial is hammering down on a simple question: Can people disagree about stocks?
75Credibility
0Ratings
0Comments
AI Analysis
Credibility 75/100
Partisan intensity 35/100
ObjectivePartisan
◉ Centre ✓ Fair headline
In Andrew Left's securities fraud trial, his defense argues that disagreement among stock analysts over company valuations is normal market behavior and does not constitute fraud, while prosecutors allege Left manipulated markets and deceived retail investors.
The defense in Andrew Left's fraud trial is hammering down on a simple question: Can people disagree about stocks?
Andrew Left, right, with his lawyer, arriving at court in Los Angeles.
Bloomberg/Getty Images
Prosecutors say short-seller Andrew Left manipulated the market and deceived retail investors.
Two stock analysts who disagreed with Left's negative reports on stocks have testified.
Left's defense has pressed the idea that disagreeing on stocks is normal and doesn't indicate fraud.
Amid the complicated financial jargon at play in short-seller Andrew Left's ongoing securities fraud trial, the defense
Discussion 0 comments
Sort:
?
No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion!