Reason
Reason
US · 55 mins ago

Another Unusual Footnote In An En Banc Fifth Circuit Opinion

Over the years, I have written about many unusual and fractured voting splits on the en banc Fifth Circuit. An en banc case decided last week made me think of another en banc case from last year. Ethridge v. Samsung SDI Let's start with Ethridge v. Samsung SDI, a personal injury case about exploding batteries. In May 2025, a divided three-judge panel (Jones, Oldham, King) ruled that the district court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant. Judge Oldham wrote the panel opinion, joined by Judge King. Judge Jones dissented, finding the district court lacked personal jurisdiction. The Defendant filed petitions for panel rehearing and en banc rehearing. In December 2025, the Fifth Circuit issued a very unusual order with two components. The first component indicates that the three-judge
Reason
Do you trust Reason?
Sign in to rate
Discussion
?

No comments yet — be the first to start the discussion!